The housefly (also house fly, house-fly or common housefly), Musca domestica, is a fly of the suborder Cyclorrhapha. It is believed to have evolved in the Cenozoic era, possibly in the Middle East, and has spread all over the world. It is the most common fly species found in habitations. Adult insects are grey to black with four dark longitudinal lines on the thorax, slightly hairy bodies and a single pair of membranous wings. They have red eyes, and the slightly larger female has these set further apart than the male. The female housefly usually only mates once and stores the sperm for later use. She lays batches of about 100 eggs on decaying organic matter such as garbage, carrion or feces. These soon hatch into legless white maggots which after 2 to 5 days of development transform into reddish-brown pupae, about 8 mm (0.3 in) long. Adult flies normally live for 2 to 4 weeks but can hibernate during the winter. The adults feed on a variety of liquid or semi-liquid substances beside solid materials which have been softened by saliva. They carry pathogens on their bodies and in their feces and can contaminate food and contribute to the transfer of food-borne illnesses. For these reasons they are considered pests, but have been used in the laboratory in research into ageing and sex determination.
Description The frontal view of a housefly Adult houseflies grow to 8–12 millimetres (0.3–0.5 in) long, with females being slightly larger than males. A scan of a house fly under a scanning electron microscope. Their thorax is gray or sometimes even black, with four longitudinal dark lines on the back. The whole body is covered with hair-like projections. The females are slightly larger than the males, and have a much larger space between their red compound eyes. The mass of pupae can range from about 8 to 20 mg under different conditions. Like other Diptera (meaning “two-winged”), houseflies have only one pair of wings; the hind pair is reduced to small halteres that aid in flight stability. Characteristically, the media vein (M1+2 or fourth long vein of the wing) shows a sharp upward bend. Species that appear similar to the housefly include: • The lesser house fly, Fannia canicularis, is smaller, more slender, and the media vein is straight. • The stable fly, Stomoxys calcitrans, has piercing mouthparts and the media vein is only slightly curved.
Life cycle Each female fly can lay approximately 500 eggs in a lifetime, in several batches of about 75 to 150. The eggs are white and are about 1.2 mm in length. Within a day, larvae (maggots) hatch from the eggs; they live and feed on (usually dead and decaying) organic material, such as garbage, carrion or feces. They are pale-whitish, 3– 9 mm long, thinner at the mouth end, and have no legs. Their life cycle ranges from 14 to 90 days. At the end of their fourth instar, the maggots crawl to a dry, cool place and transform into pupae, coloured reddish or brown and about 8 mm long. The adult flies then emerge from the pupae. (This whole cycle is known as complete metamorphosis.) The adults live from two weeks to a month in the wild, or longer in benign laboratory conditions. Having emerged from the pupae, the flies cease to grow; small flies are not necessarily young flies, but are instead the result of getting insufficient food during the larval stage. Musca domestica mating Some 36 hours after having emerged from the pupa, the female is receptive for mating. The male mounts her from behind to inject sperm. Copulation takes a few seconds to a couple of minutes. Normally, the female mates only once, storing the sperm to use it repeatedly for laying several sets of eggs. The flies depend on warm temperatures; generally, the warmer the temperature, the faster the flies will develop.
Aging Because the somatic tissue of the housefly consists of long-lived post-mitotic cells, it can be used as an informative model system for understanding cumulative age-related cellular alterations. Agarwal and Sohal studied the level of the oxidative DNA damage 8- Housefly pupae are killed by parasitic wasp larvae. Each pupa has one hole through which a single adult wasp emerged; feeding occurs during the wasp's larval stage. Illustration of a housefly hydroxydeoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) in houseflies. They found that the level of 8-OHdG increased with age of the flies. They also found an inverse association of 8-OHdG level with life expectancy of the flies. They concluded that their results support the hypothesis that oxidative molecular damage is a causal factor in senescence (aging). These findings are in accord with the general view that oxidative DNA damage, particularly in post-mitotic tissues, is a principal cause of aging. (Also see DNA damage theory of aging.) 6.2 Potential in waste management 3
Sex determination The housefly is an object of biological research, mainly because of one remarkable quality: the sex determination mechanism. Although a wide variety of sex determination mechanisms exist in nature (e.g. male and female heterogamy, haplodiploidy, environmental factors), the way sex is determined is usually fixed within one species. The housefly is thought to exhibit several different mechanisms for sex determination, such as male heterogamy (like most insects and mammals), female heterogamy (like birds) and maternal control over offspring sex. The exact mechanism of sex determination in the housefly is, however, still unresolved.
Evolution Even though the order of flies (Diptera) is much older, true houseflies are believed to have evolved in the beginning of the Cenozoic era. They are thought to have originated in the southern Palearctic region, particularly the Middle East. Because of their close, commensal relationship with humans, they probably owe their worldwide dispersal to co-migration with humans. The house fly is the most common of all domestic flies, accounting for about 91% of all flies in human habitations, and indeed one of the most widely distributed insects, found all over the world.
Relationship with humans House flies are capable of carrying over 100 pathogens, such as those causing typhoid, cholera, salmonellosis,  bacillary dysentery,  tuberculosis, anthrax, ophthalmia, and parasitic worms.  Some strains have become immune to the most common insecticides.  House flies feed on liquid or semiliquid substances beside solid material which has been softened by saliva or vomit. Because of their large intake of food they deposit feces constantly, which is one of the factors that makes the insect a dangerous carrier of pathogens. Although they are domestic flies, usually confined to human habitations, they can fly for several miles from the breeding place. They are active only in daytime, and rest at night, e.g., at the corners of rooms, ceiling hangings, cellars, and barns, where they can survive the coldest winters by hibernation, and when spring arrives, adult flies are seen only a few days after the first thaw.
As a transmitter of disease Mechanical transmission of organisms on its hairs, mouthparts, vomitus and feces: • parasitic diseases: cysts of protozoa e.g. Entamoeba histolytica, Giardia lamblia and eggs of helminths, e.g., Ascaris lumbricoides, Trichuris trichiura, Hymenolepis nana, Enterobius vermicularis. • bacterial diseases: typhoid, cholera, dysentery, pyogenic cocci, etc. House flies have been demonstrated to be vectors of Campylobacter and E. coli O157:H7 using PCR.  House flies can be monitored for bacterial pathogens using filter paper spot cards and PCR  • Viruses: enteroviruses: poliomyelitis, viral hepatitis (A & E)..etc.
Potential in waste management house fly maggots feeding on cow manure. The ability of housefly larvae to feed and develop in a wide range of decaying organic matter is important for recycling of nutrients in nature. Research suggests that this adaptation may be exploited to combat ever-increasing amounts of waste. Housefly larvae can be mass-reared in a controlled manner in animal manure, thus reducing the bulk of waste and minimizing environmental risks of its disposal. Harvested maggots may be used as feed for animal nutrition.
 Larraín, Patricia; Salas, Claudio; Salas F (2008). “House fly (Musca domestica L.) (Diptera: Muscidae) development in different types of manure [Desarrollo de la Mosca Doméstica (Musca domestica L.) (Díptera: Muscidae) en Distintos Tipos de Estiércol]". Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research 68 (2): 192–197. doi:10.4067/S0718- 58392008000200009. ISSN 0718-5839.
 Stuart M. Bennett (2003). “Housefly”.
 Anthony DeBartolo (June 5, 1986). “Buzz off! The housefly has made a pest of himself for 25 million years”. Chicago Tribune.
 Agarwal, S; Sohal, RS (December 1994). “DNA oxidative damage and life expectancy in house- flies”. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 91 4 8 EXTERNAL LINKS (25): 12332–5. Bibcode:1994PNAS...9112332A. doi:10.1073/pnas.91.25.12332. PMC 45431. PMID 7991627.
 Holmes, GE; Bernstein, C; Bernstein, H (September 1992). “Oxidative and other DNA damages as the basis of aging: a review”. Mutation Research 275 (3–6): 305–15. doi:10.1016/0921-8734(92)90034-M. PMID 1383772.
 Bernstein, Harris; Payne, Claire M.; Bernstein, Carol; Garewal, Harinder; Dvorak, Katerina (2008). “Cancer and Aging as Consequences of Un-repaired DNA Damage”. In Kimura, Honoka; Suzuki, Aoi. New Research on DNA Damages. New York: Nova Science Publishers. pp. 1–47. ISBN 978-1-60456-581-2.
 Dübendorfer, A; Hediger, M; Burghardt, G; Bopp, D (2002). "Musca domestica, a window on the evolution of sex-determining mechanisms in insects”. International Journal of Developmental Biology 46 (1): 75–79. PMID 11902690.
 Wiegmann, BM; Yeates, DK; Thorne, JL; Kishino, H (December 2003). “Time flies, a new molecular time-scale for brachyceran fly evolution without a clock”. Systematic Biology 52 (6): 745–56. doi:10.1093/sysbio/52.6.745. PMID 14668115.
 Ostrolenk, M.; Welch H. (1942). “The house fly as a vector of food poisoning organisms in food producing establishments”. American Journal of Public Health 32 (5): 487–494. doi:10.2105/ajph.32.5.487.
 Levine, O.S.; Levine M.M. (1991). “House flies (Musca domestica) as mechanical vectors of shigellosis”. Reviews of Infectious Diseases 13 (4): 688–696. doi:10.1093/clinids/13.4.688. PMID 1925289.
 Förster, M.; Klimpel, S.; Sievert, K. (2009). “The house fly (Musca domestica) as a potential vector of metazoan parazites caught in a pig-pen in Germany”. Veterinary Parasitology 160 (1–2): 163–167. doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.10.087. PMID 19081196.
 Georghiou, GP; Hawley, MK (1971). “Insecticide resistance resulting from sequential selection of houseflies in the field by organophosphorus compounds”. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 45 (1): 43–51. PMC 2427889. PMID 5316852.
 Keiding, J. (1975). “Problems of housefly (Musca domestica) control due to multiresistance to insecticides”. Journal of Hygiene, Epidemiology, Microbiology, and Immunology 19 (3): 340–355. PMID 52667.
 Nazni, W.A.; Luke, H.; Wan Rozita, W.M.; Abdullah, A.G.; Sadiyah, I.; Azahari, A.H.; Zamree, I.; Tan S.B.; Lee H.L. & Sofian A.M. (2005). “Determination of the flight range and dispersal of the house fly, Musca domestica (L.) using mark release recapture technique”. Tropical Biomedicine 22 (1): 53–61. PMID 16880754.
 A. L. Szalanski; C. B. Owens; T. Mckay; C. D. Steelman (2004). “Detection of Campylobacter and Escherichia coli O157:H7 from filth flies by polymerase chain reaction”. Medical and Entomology 18 (3): 241– 246. doi:10.1111/j.0269-283X.2004.00502.x. PMID 15347391.
 Sheri M. Brazil; C. Dayton Steelman; Allen L. Szalanski (2007). “Detection of pathogen DNA from filth flies (Diptera: Muscidae) using filter paper spot cards”. Journal of Agricultural and Urban Entomology 24 (1): 13–18. doi:10.3954/1523-5475-24.1.13.
 Miller B. F.; Teotia J. S.; Thatcher T. O. (1974). “Digestion of poultry manure by Musca domestica”. British Poultry Science 15 (2): 231–1. doi:10.1080/00071667408416100. PMID 4447887.
 Cickova H.; Pastor B.; Kozanek M.; Martinez-Sanchez A.; Rojo S.; Takac P. (2012). “Biodegradation of pig manure by the housefly, Musca domestica: A viable ecological strategy for pig manure management”. PLoS ONE 7 (3): e32798. Bibcode:2012PLoSO...732798C. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0032798. PMC 3303781. PMID 22431982.
 Zhu FX.; Wang WP.; Hong CL.; Feng MG.; Xue ZY.; Chen XY.; Yao YL.; Yu M. (2012). “Rapid production of maggots as feed supplement and organic fertilizer by the two-stage composting of pig manure”. Bioresource Technology 116: 485–491. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2012.04.008. PMID 22541952.
 Hwangbo J.; Hong E. C.; Jang A.; Kang H. K.; Oh J. S.; Kim B. W.; Park B. S. (2009). “Utilization of house flymaggots, a feed supplement in the production of broiler chickens”. Journal of Environmental Biology 30 (4): 609– 614. PMID 20120505.